View Mobile Site

Ellinwood Council OKs Neighborhood Revitalization Plan

Trash pickup changes discussed

POSTED September 13, 2017 4:19 p.m.

ELLINWOOD — A small quorum of three Ellinwood City Council members met Monday night in regular session, and took action on a number of business items. However, all three present, Gaila Demel, Ken Lebbin and Alan Brauer, opted to table action concerning options for payment of a proposed bond and authorizing the resolution for bond sale until a full council can be present. That meeting is tentatively planned for the first week of October, and the city will announce the date through the media as soon as it is set.

NRP
A brief public hearing for Ellinwood’s proposed Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP) was conducted. The program provides property owners a tax rebate incentive for making improvements of at least $10,000 and increasing the appraised value of their property at least 10 percent for residential, and $20,000 and an increase in value of at least 20 percent for commercial. Depending on if the property sits in the primary or secondary target areas, the amount of the rebate varies, and could continue from five to eight years. Application must be made within 30 days of receiving a building permit.
One patron inquired if the benefit would pass to future owners, and was informed that it will not. With no further questions, the council closed the hearing and approved the plan. An interlocal agreement was also approved, and the agreement will now be presented to Barton County, Barton Community College, Ellinwood District Hospital, and USD 355, asking for their participation in the NRP. The program will be retroactive to Jan. 1, but application must be made for these retroactive projects within 30 days of the program’s adoption.

Trash pick-up
The discussion of changes to the city’s trash pick-up schedule was reopened. At the August meeting, City Manager Chris Komarek proposed the city could save revenue if during the summer, pick-up was cut back to once a week. But, after further consideration, Monday he told council members the savings would not outweigh the benefit to residents of year-round twice weekly pickup.
“There might be a small amount of savings with that, but I think it creates a lot of other issues,” he said. If a resident forgets or is out of town, for instance, they could end up having to store their trash for up to two weeks. Plus, this could result in having more trash outside the cans, he said.
What the city would like to do is find a way to not have to utilize the rear loader as well as the side loader for trash pick-up twice each week. So, Komarek instead proposed only running the side loader, and informing patrons that all trash must be in cans for pickup. Enforcement will have to be stepped up, with a warning tag placed on the can the first time excess trash is left by the can. After that, trash not in a can will not be picked up.
This will free up man hours that can be devoted to other projects around the city. It was also noted the city charges $12 per month for pick-up of one can twice a week, but an additional can be added for $3.

COMMENTS

  • Bookmark and Share

No comments have been posted. Log in or Register to post a comment.
http://www.gbtribune.com/ encourages readers to interact with one another. We will not edit your comments, but we reserve the right to delete any inappropriate responses. To report offensive or inappropriate comments, contact our editor.

The comments below are from readers of http://beta.gbtribune.com/ and do not necessarily represent the views of The Newspaper or Morris Multimedia.
To post a comment you must be a registered user of www.gbtribune.com.


POST A COMMENT


Please wait ...