Ohio is in trouble for daring to suggest that naked dancing girls shouldn’t do anything besides dance.
They shouldn’t be touching the patrons or each other.
That goes beyond touching.
You’d think that would be obvious.
You would be wrong.
In this age of wrong thinking, it would be real wrong.
Because, see if you can follow along now, it seems that prostitution — performing sex for money — is not an aspect of free speech.
True, most of us would not include public sex as a manner of speech at all, but that doesn’t keep it out of the courts in this cock-eyed country of ours.
Fortunately, this week, the court has spoken, and, as the Associated Press reported, it ruled that “the 2007 law does not go against the businesses’ rights of free speech and expression.”
The courts have ruled that there is no First Amendment violation in this law.
Amazing.
It’s good to know that states aren’t violating the Constitution when they suggest that sex is a private act and that it’s not something to be trotted out for financial gain.
Good job, 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
We’re just lucky the case wasn’t brought in California.
— Chuck Smith